I have a theory about conspiracy theories.
Every day we read novels and watch films and TV dramas where the ‘bad guys’ put together an incredibly complex plot to achieve their plans.
One ‘good guy’ starts to piece together the clues and sets off on a trail to pursue the ‘bad guys’, a trail that invariably leads him into conflict with the authorities, his friends and colleagues and, apparently, common sense.
After a series of tortuous twists and turns, false trails and apparent failure our ‘good guy’ finally tracks down and defeats the ‘bad guys’ (or not, in some cases).
It is the staple of so many Hollywood thrillers and TV dramas, and the formula is so pervasive that it has shaped our view of the world.
What these stories all possess is certainty.
Each chunk of the plot fits snugly to the next one and even the apparent false trails and wrong turns are all part of this neatly ordered universe.
So, when a significant real event takes place, some people choose to believe that it has been engineered from start to finish. Even with the most terrible events, the idea that it has a logical sequence gives a greater sense of comfort and security than the alternative, that it is totally beyond our control.
Some choose to call it God or fate. Others call it a conspiracy because the order and logic of a conspiracy is preferable to the idea of chaos, disorder and random events.
Added to this, the weight of peer pressure strengthens the conspiracy theory view of the world – that those who support conspiracy theories must have a greater insight into the workings of those in power and have access to knowledge and information that only the few, the ‘good guys’ can reach. And therefore, by default, those who deny conspiracy theories are either a) part of the conspiracy or b) naïve and trusting dupes of the organisation(s) that have generated the conspiracy.
And yet, the event that is perceived to be the result of a conspiracy is often hugely complex. There are countless strands, sequences and apparently loose ends relying on so many steps and actions that, even with a few minor changes, could easily lead to a different end result.
A study of history … and science for that matter … show this to be the case.
In spite of all this, those who disagree with the idea of conspiracy often cannot disprove all of the evidence and their failure to disprove is enough proof for the ‘truth’ of the conspiracy.
The conspiracy theory then is often the triumph of unreason, disguised as inevitable logic, over reason.